Please do not reply to this Newsletter. You will likely get a response from a machine, not Nancy! For feedback on the Newsletter or to correspond with Nancy, click here instead.

Stolen Nukes

On August 30, 2007 several nuclear warheads almost slipped out of the continental US and into obscurity. They left the heartland and headed for the coast.

Sources: B-52 Mistakenly Carried Nukes
September 5, 2007
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070905/D8RFBJN00.html

A B-52 bomber was mistakenly loaded with five nuclear warheads during a flight from North Dakota to Louisiana. The bomber carried advanced cruise missiles as part of a Defense Department program to retire 400 of the missiles, the Military Times said. The nuclear warheads should have been removed before the missiles were mounted onto pylons under the bomber's wings for the Aug. 30 flight from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. He said an investigation was launched and the crews involved in loading the missiles were decertified pending corrective action or training.

Does this have something to do with all those innuendoes about bombing or invading Iran? It does indeed, per the Zetas.

ZetaTalk Explanation 9/8/2007: Closely examine the excuses given out by the Air Force and you can see what actually happened here. These nukes were being taken out of the country. The fact that they were missing from the arsenal was not to be discovered until after they had escaped the continental US, having been moved from the heartland to the Gulf where they could be transferrred to a ship along the convoluted and unprotected Louisiana coastline. The locals go fishing daily, and does anyone check those boats as they go off into the Gulf? The Air Force states the nukes were "never out of their control", admitting this theft was an Air Force operation. Ah, but it was an oversight that the nukes were not removed from the missiles, no? No. The list of steps that had to be overlooked was lengthy, involving numerous people, to ensure that just such a happenstance would not occur. For instance, person A makes a step, person B makes a step, both in the presence of each other. Person C asks both if they have performed their step and checks the results, noting this on a form next sent on to an office. Person D comes in independently from that office and verifies the step was done, also checking with persons A, B, and C. And this would be just for a single step.

So were all these individuals involved in the theft of five nuclear warheads? Note that if the person from the office where the form was sent were looking the other way, then the step does not necessarily need to include persons A, B, and C, or even person D if he was unaware a duty was to be performed. The order to perform the step in the first place would simply not be made. The higher up the chain this lack of oversight goes, the fewer the number of people who need to be involved in the conspiracy. But such a conspiracy presumes that those normally involved in this type of procedure are brain-dead, or so in synch with orders from above that they question nothing. It also presumes that we, the telepathic Zetas, would be unaware of such a plot. As we have reiterated numerous times, we and humans in the contingent that is blocking Bush stop operations that Bush orders. Normally, these operations are stopped early, before the public becomes aware of them. The new plan is to allow the public to become aware of the plots, where possible, so as to expose what Bush is attempting to do. This was one such opportunity.

What were Bush and Company trying to achieve? Bush has been desperate to invoke martial law within the US, and needs a panic within the American public to do so. He is being blocked from simply declaring martial law, which he has attempted numerous times. Bush has also been trying to bomb and/or invade Iran, and has given this order numerous times. He has shuffled commanders, each time finding his new commanders are blocking his orders too. We mentioned years ago that many in the US military maintain a façade of cooperation with Bush, but are sleepers, having arranged to put themselves in influential positions for just such a time when they might be given a illegal order, which they could then refuse. Bush and Cheney concluded that if US nukes could be smuggled out of the country and put into the hands of contractors loyal to their masters and the almighty dollar, they could start something - bomb US facilities and point the finger at Iran, or potentially bomb a facility in Iran so as to incite a counterattack. Once again they have failed, but what they did achieve was a heightened sense within the contingent blocking Bush that they must act, as Bush is pulling out all the stops. The contingent must now move from passive resistance to a state of war!

Iraq Status

September is the month when General Petraeus delivers his much awaited report on the results of the surge. The battle lines are already being drawn. First front is progress or lack thereof on the "benchmarks" that Congress insisted upon when they last funded the war effort. Congress insisted on these benchmarks as the reasons for staying in Iraq, as defined by the Bush administration, kept shifting and changing. Bush of course would like to state that the benchmarks are being met, even if this means re-defining them or selecting the data to be examined. Volley one was from the US military itself, with General Petraeus admitting the military is exhausted, broken, and the current level of deployment is not sustainable past March, 2008.

Time to Head to Congress
September 4, 2007
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Story?id=3556742&page=1

The top military general in Iraq hinted that next week's much-anticipated report on the status of the troop surge in Iraq would include a recommendation for troop reduction in March, if not sooner, to avoid a strain on the Army.

Volley two was Bush dropping by to visit Iraq, into a protected base in the middle of nowhere, far away from any current violence, for a photo op. If it is safe enough for a presidential visit, then progress must be assumed.

Volley three was from Congress, with Senator Biden not buying it.

Biden: Bush's Iraq Withdrawal Comments 'a Diversion'
September 4, 2007
http://rawstory.com//news/2007/

Al Asad Air Force Base is out in the middle of nowhere. It's 15,000 acres surrounded by a fence. There has been a lot of discussion of progress in Anbar Province, where tribal chiefs have begun fighting al Qaeda, but there are no signs of progress in the fighting between Sunnis and Shias. Prior to the surge, people were fleeing their neighborhoods at 50,000 people a month. Since the surge, they've been fleeing their neighborhoods at 100,000 per month.

Volley four was from the GAO, which reported that only 3 of 18 benchmarks had been met. Bush, of course, was enraged that the report had been "leaked" before he had a change to massage or counter it.

GAO Skeptical that Iraq Security Can Last
September 5, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/

As Congress opened a monthlong showdown with President Bush over Iraq, Senate war critics on Tuesday demanded evidence that the security improvements claimed by the White House could be sustained once American forces hand off the task of maintaining order to Iraqi military units. The GAO report found that of 18 designated benchmarks set out for Iraqi leaders last year, the country has met three, partially met four and failed to meet 11. The agency's findings that benchmarks had not been met were widely reported last week.

Volley five was a counter by Bush that the assessment should be moved from September 2007 to April 2008!

Bush Faces Political Clash Over War Plan
September 5, 2007
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/

April may become the new September when it comes to deciding whether to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq, if President Bush's senior advisers have their way. But Congress might not stand for it. Since Bush ordered the deployment of some 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Iraq in January, he urged Congress to give the new plan until at least September to work. Accordingly, this month became a deadline among lawmakers for substantial progress, including several Republicans who said they were wary of Bush's military strategy but agreed for the most part to bite their tongues until then. Now, administration officials are recommending Bush stand by his war strategy until the spring, and Bush is considered unlikely to order more than a symbolic cut in troops before the end of the year.

Matters should heat up as the formal report to Congress takes place in mid-September, perhaps as Bush has suggested on the anniversary of September 11. Meanwhile, how does the action line up with what the Zetas predicted at the start of the surge last January?

Zeta Prediction 1/13/2007: We have mentioned repeatedly during this past year, as the heat on Iran has been turned up by the White House, that the original plan included invading Iran and Saudi Arabia so the Bush crowd could fully occupy the oil fields of the Middle East at the time of the pole shift. They see this time approaching, and are making a final desperate push despite all opposition. Bush has ordered Iran to be attacked repeatedly, during this past year, with the military refusing each time. Now he has replaced his generals in Iraq and has put a compliant Navy man over the entire theatre of operations, including Afghanistan. He has issued orders from the White House in every direction, hoping that some will slip by the guardians who are preventing an all out debacle in the Middle East. His orders are countered, stymied, blocked, but he hopes to overcome these maneuvers eventually, knowing that once a conflagration starts, it is hard to put out. Bush has been stirring the pot, blowing up the Golden Mosque to encourage civil war, and taunting the Iranians. None of this will work, as they see the game plan and understand that their role is to not engage.

What will the outcome be, of this last desperate push to force the US Military to attack Iran, to have an excuse to call a draft in the US, and to invade the Saudi fields in order to 'protect' them from terrorists? The current modus operandi of the Bush countering will continue, stepping up as his press steps up, and will hold. Beyond holding, the Bush press will run into snags in the Congress, will enrage the American people and Congress so they take action to pull down the troop levels in Iraq by the many means at their disposal. Meanwhile, the hand played by the increasing Earth changes is not even being considered during this human drama. We have stated that by the time the last weeks arrive, that emergency management teams, including the US Military as an arm of FEMA, will be so engaged in rescuing Americans in distress that all will be turning a deaf ear to angry demands from the White House. This point, when Bush's concerns will be irrelevant, is just around the corner. Bush will simply be ignored.

Pakistan Bridge

Another bridge collapse, this time in Pakistan. Newly constructed, built for heavy traffic, and inaugurated by Pakistan's President Musharraf.

Five killed in Shershah bridge collapse
September 5, 2007
http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=117348

At least five persons were killed and several people were injured when a portion of newly inaugurated Shershah Northern By Pass bridge connecting to Hub River caved in at Paracha Chowk of Karachi. The authorities fear that the death toll could rise. The rest of the bridge has also developed serious cracks and it is feared that it would also collapse. Nazim Karachi Mustafa Kamal has said that NHA had constructed the bridge and a probe would be held to ascertain the real cause of the bridge collapse. President Musharraf had inaugurated the bridge last month. According to sources NHA and FWO had constructed the bridge for heavy traffic.

This bridge at Karachi is along the border between the great Eurasian plate with the Indio/Australian plate. The major river in Pakistan, the Indus, flows past Karchi. As the Zetas have pointed out, rivers run along low spots, and these low spots are where the underlying rock layers have pulled apart, separating during plate adjustments. Is this what caused the Karachi bridge to collapse?

ZetaTalk Explanation 9/8/2007: There has been ample evidence that the Indio/Australian plate is moving, pushing under the Himalayas and sinking India as it does so. Since this plate loosened during the great December 26, 2004 Sumatra quake, there have been reports of high water along India's eastern shores, beyond what any rising sea level would produce. What happens when one plate moves, while the neighboring plate remains? A rip, affecting any bridges or rail lines or structures with a footing on both sides of this rip. Such rips affect more than just the immediate area, as the stress is transferred to either side, weak points giving and strong points holding. Since the cover-up over the presence of Planet X forbids any discussion of how the plates are moving these days, some faulty construction issue will be put forth as the cause. But as with the Minneapolis and Memphis bridge problems, the engineers will find no problem to account for the collapse.

The Zetas have indeed predicted an inland bay, similar to the N American continent's St. Lawrence Seaway, ripping up through Pakistan during the coming pole shift.



ZetaTalk Prediction 2001: Being situated on the foot of the Eurasian Plate, and bordering the southern fault line of this plate, Pakistan be subject to what may seem like endless quakes due to the number of changes affecting the area. After the hour of the shift, Pakistan will find itself with an inland bay caused by the ripping and sinking of the Eurasian Plate just to the west of Pakistan.

Bin Laden Trade

The internet is abuzz about what has been termed the "Bin Laden trade", a put option that could lose the bettor a billion dollars or more if the markets turn up, rather than down.

Mystery Trader places $4.5 Billion Bet Market will crash by 9/21
August 27, 2007
http://www.freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=24336

$4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks. Anybody have a clue as to what these 'investors' are expecting? The two sales are being referred to by market traders as "bin Laden trades" because only an event on the scale of 9-11 could make these short-sell options valuable. The entity or individual offering these sales can only make money if the market drops 30%-50% within the next four weeks. If the market does not drop, the entity or individual involved stands to lose over $1 billion just for engaging in these contracts! Clearly, someone knows something big is going to happen before the options expire on September 21.

The following theories are being discussed widely within the stock and options markets today regarding the enormous and very unusual activity reported above and two stories below. Those theories are:

 

1) A massive terrorist attack is going to take place before September 21 to tank the markets, OR;

2) China, reeling over losing $10 billion in bad loans to the sub-prime mortgage collapse presently taking place, is going to dump US currency and tank all of Capitalism with a Communist financial revolution.

 

Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11. Back then, they bought huge numbers of puts on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were involved in the September 11 attacks.

ZetaTalk Prediction 9/8/2007: The bottom line is in this put option that if the markets go up, they lose a huge amount of money. If the markets go down, there are varying profits to be made. Even for billionaires, who might have lost heavily in the hedge fund losses due to the housing bubble bust, this is a high risk. Gamblers, however, often invest good money after bad, after a loss as this is part of their compulsion - to win at all costs, risking all. The assumption is that the markets will play out as they have historically done. It is logical for a disaster as large as the recent housing bubble bust to have repercussions for many months, as the effect ripples through the economy. The US construction industry was booming due to all the potential mortgage holders given credit when they did not qualify. Now these companies are distressed, and layoffs are occurring. Industries supplying the construction industry are having orders canceled. And the US public, during this credit squeeze and hearing the horror stories about defaulting home loans from friends and co-workers, are more cautious about spending at all, on anything. Logically, the markets would continue to flounder.

Is there more to this, as speculated? Is insider knowledge of something happenstance to take place in September at work here, something that would drop the markets like a stone? Indeed as suspected there is insider knowledge, but not on any factors of which the public is not already aware.

As anyone following the news can determine, the tit for tat games the Bush administration is playing with China have continued, Bush kicking the dragon, betting that the Puppet Master will not allow China to bring the US down too quickly, as the Puppet Master does not want bank failures. But what is the limit of the Puppet Master's rage against his errant Puppets, Bush and Cheney? How precipitous a drop is to be allowed? The Puppet Master does not care about some loan companies washing out, as over a hundred have done during this housing bubble bust. The banks are holding without failures. The Puppet Master does not care about a slowing US economy, as his interests are worldwide and he is aware that the economies will go belly up during the pole shift in any case. Ultimate ownership, and an unbroken link to the Puppet Master as owner, is his concern. The banks hold the debtor/creditor relationships, the links to the Puppet Master as ultimate owner, and this has not been broken. Thus, someone with inside knowledge on the Puppet Master's rage, and orders to punish the Bush administration, could surmise with accuracy that China will be allowed to slam Bush, using the dollar as a weapon. This is indeed in the plans, in the works, but how this plays out in the markets is subject to many factors, and is in the hands of man. Thus, our predictions cannot be assumed to be accurate, as man is allowed free will in these matters.

Hurricane Pinch

Breaking all records, hurricanes Felix and Henriette pinched the N American continent, making landfall at the same time on both coastlines.

Twin Storms Pack Dangerous Winds
September 4, 2007
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070904/D8RESEA80.html

Felix walloped Central America's remote Miskito coastline and Henriette slammed into resorts on the tip of Baja California as a record-setting hurricane season got even wilder with twin storms making landfall on the same day. Atlantic and Pacific hurricanes making landfall on the same day is unprecedented, according to National Hurricane Center records dating back to 1949. Felix roared ashore before dawn as a Category 5 storm along Nicaragua's remote northeast corner. In the Pacific, Henriette's top winds increased to 85 mph and it made landfall on the southern tip of Baja, a resort area popular with Hollywood stars and sports fishermen. Henriette was on a path to drench Mexico's northern deserts, and its remnants are forecast to drop drop an inch or two of rain on Arizona and New Mexico in the Southwest on Thursday night. The Mexican government declared a state of emergency in southern Baja California. Tuesday was historic for two reasons: It was the first time on record that two Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes made landfall in the same year, with Felix coming two weeks after Hurricane Dean slammed into southern Mexico. And Atlantic and Pacific hurricanes have never made landfall the same day, according to records dating back to 1949.

Does this portent a stronger hurricane season, or a change in hurricane patterns? The Zetas stated that our erratic weather is caused by the Earth wobble, the tugging on the S Pole and pushing against the N Pole daily, caused by the presence of that magnetic giant, Planet X. They warned of increasing problems and unpredictability with all weather - drought, deluge, tornadoes, and hurricanes.

ZetaTalk Explanation 8/4/2007: Hurricane predictions are off target because the forecasters are not taking into consideration the right factors. They ignore the wobble which moves land under the atmosphere so the temperature of the land and air mingle and equalize. They ignore the new position of the Moon, which pulls on water by gravity as the Earth turns under it. They ignore the mild sloshing of the oceans during the wobble, which changes the temperature of a water mass by this mixing process. While the hurricane season has been mild, tornadoes have appeared in unusual places, and certainly drought and deluge have been devastating around the world. It is not just the hurricane season that has proved unpredictable. This inability to predict the weather in general will continue and in fact get worse, as we long ago predicted.

You received this Newsletter because you subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe.