Bombing the Moon
NASA announced that it plans to bomb the Moon. Seriously. They gave as an excuse/explanation the 
need to determine if water was beneath the surface on the Moon, so that future moon bases could rely 
upon this water.  
- NASA Prepares to Bomb the Moon
 
June 18, 2009 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/space/5566137/Nasa-prepares-to-bomb-the-moon.html 
- NASA scientists are preparing to launch a space mission from Cape Canaveral carrying a 
missile that will fire a hole deep in the surface of the moon. The aim is to see whether any 
traces of water will be revealed by the disruption caused to the planet's surface. NASA will 
analyse the space cloud caused by the explosion for any sign of water or vapour. Scientists 
expect the impact to blast out a huge cloud of dust, gas and vaporized water ice at least 6 
miles high - making it visible from Earth. If the search is successful it could provide vital 
supplies for a moonbase.
 
 
Given the financial distress, the second Great Depression, the world is struggling with, this hardly seems a 
priority. As George Ure of the UrbanSurvival website complains. 
Of all the questions that we could be asking and spending taxpayer money on, 
where does this one fit? Just going out on a limb here, I'd say that answering 
questions like "How can we help the 2-billion people who living on less than $2 a 
day globally" might be worth considering. Or, "since the oceans are dying, how do 
we fix that?" 
 
Naturally, the Zetas were asked to comment, and comment they did. They came up with the only 
explanation that fits. The elite are still trying to find a pole shift safe location to ride out the hour of the 
shift.  
 
ZetaTalk Explanation 6/20/2009: The sudden interest in the Moon is not due to a long range plan 
to create a Moon base, but is to prepare for the immediate exit from Earth of the planet's elite. 
How can this be occurring you might ask, when Obama is in the White House? The layers between 
a Chief Executive and the projects undertaken by a contract corporation, projects often on the 
books and approved for years, are such that Obama would have to induce Congress to terminate 
NASA in order to stop this operation. It is what he inherited, and he can only do so much.  
 
We have often alluded to the plans of the elite to escape to Mars, living there until the pole shift 
had passed and they could safely return to Earth as kings. This was all to be assisted by 
Service-to-Self aliens who would transport and house them. Of course, the Service-to-Self lie and 
when pressed refused to transport the elite anywhere. Then there was the hope of bunkers on 
Earth, which have proven to be a disastrous plan as rock under pressure emits lethal particle 
flows. Crews sent underground to test this out died. Forced to contemplate enduring the hour of 
the pole shift on the surface of the Earth with the common man the elite so much despise, they 
desperately cast around for alternatives.  
 
Man can go to the Moon, and private funding abounds for private space travel. The bomb is to dig 
a cavern that will presumably protect the elite in their erected structures from debris in the tail of 
Planet X. How will all this fare, in the short time between now and the pole shift? Poorly, but the 
details of their failure is something we prefer to withhold, less they learn from our warnings. True 
karma is prevailing on Earth, with the elite not faring any better than the common man.  
 
Indeed, this is a prediction the Zetas made in 1999, that the elite would attempt to leave the surface of 
Earth during the pole shift. In 1999 the plans of the elite were to go to Mars, and during the Bush 
administration there was much chatter about manned Mars missions. Since NASA is not in shape for a 
rush to Mars, the Moon apparently is the new spaceport of choice. The Zetas predicted the Mars 
missions would not succeed, just as they are predicting the Moon missions will not succeed.  
 
ZetaTalk Prediction 1/15/1999: From its inception, NASA was attempting to secure, as much as 
anything, an escape from the forthcoming cataclysms. They still have that as a dominant agenda. 
The members of NASA and JPL who have been watching Planet X approach in accordance with 
our predictions some 50 years ago, have come to nervously accept that the reality of our exact 
predictions. They wish to find a safe haven during the shift itself. The thought of being on an 
Earth that will slip about with sloshing water and crashing plates is unsettling. They would like a 
vantage point on Mars, and from that when the rock and roll is over, they would settle down at 
the best looking agricultural setting in the world and walk off well prepared to take over as kings. 
 
This escape route would be for the elite of not only the US government and US military but other 
elites around the world. This is well disguised in talk about science research in the skies and 
exploring the universe, but this is all to camouflage the real plans which would be to take dozens 
and even hundreds of individuals away. The fact that John Glen recently went up into space was 
to test how oldsters deal with these takeoffs and landings. This was poorly disguised, and the tax 
payer wondered why they needed geriatrics in space. Well, of course, that's because some of these 
people who have secured a place for themselves are not that young, and they are just getting 
prepared. The group will be composed primarily of old man and very young women. It's not 
surprising that George Bush, Sr. took a sky dive recently and mentioned in the news that he was 
not too old for such activity. He is trying to demonstrate to his peers that he's ready to go. 
 
They hope to get up there and setup a base which will be of very firm, air-sealed and air-locked, 
tents with little suits that they can get into quickly. They're already practicing how to grow their 
own food via hydroponics. This is something that has been going on for decades, of course, as a 
means to provide fresh food for those in a space station. They are looking for water, but they 
know there is water on Mars. They hope to watch the show from a distance. Watch the Earth, 
poor thing, lurch about. After a year or so has passed, when they can see that things have settled 
down, they'll come back down. They'll zoom around, taking their time deciding just where to land, 
and will land where there seems to be some good agriculture, some settlements, and emerge as 
kings. This is their plan, but none of this will happen. They won't succeed, but we don't expect 
them to give up. 
 
Many layers are built between the taxpayers eyes and the actual NASA expenditures. NASA is an 
independent company under contract to the government, under contract in fact to government agencies 
that can scarcely be scrutinized by the average taxpayer so that layer upon layer of money shuffling 
protects the real expenditures and plans very nicely. National security is used as the excuse.  
 
Classified Bolides  
If bombing the Moon is confusing, making incoming debris from space classified seems whacky. What 
possible reason could there be for this move? None was given, frankly. Information on incoming space 
debris, freely given to scientists for the past 15 years, is no longer going to be made available to said 
scientists.  
- Military Hush-Up: Incoming Space Rocks Now Classified
 
June 10, 2009  
http://www.space.com/news/090610-military-fireballs.html 
- A recent U.S. military policy decision now explicitly states that observations by hush-hush 
government spacecraft of incoming bolides and fireballs are classified secret and are not to 
be released. The satellites' main objectives include detecting nuclear bomb tests, and their 
characterizations of asteroids and lesser meteoroids as they crash through the atmosphere 
has been a byproduct data bonanza for scientists. Over the last decade or so, hundreds of 
these events have been spotted by the classified satellites. Priceless observational 
information derived from the spacecraft were made quickly available, giving researchers 
such insights as time, a location, height above the surface, as well as light-curves to help pin 
down the amount of energy churned out from the fireballs. But all that ended within the last 
few months, leaving scientists blind-sided and miffed by the shift in policy. The hope is that 
the policy decision will be revisited and overturned. 
 
 
Bombing the Moon and classifying meteors. What next. Per the Zetas, the two are related. A Moon base 
for the elite and covering up the increasing debris incoming from the tail of Planet X - both are related to 
the coming passage. Per the Zetas, the establishment fears that a pattern in the increasing incidence of 
fireballs will be discovered, leading scientists to conclude that this is debris in the tail of a planet near the 
Sun. This is the conclusion the establishment fears, and thus the fireballs and meteors and near Earth 
objects are now classified.  
 
ZetaTalk Explanation 6/20/2009: There was obviously no harm done to national security during 
the decade that data from these satellites was shared with scientists, so why the change? There is 
no explanation given, just the change in policy. On the face of it, this policy change is to prevent 
the bulk of scientists from seeing the increasing evidence of a rogue planet in the inner solar 
system. The tail, as we have been stating, is turning toward the Earth, and this means increasing 
fireballs screaming across the skies. It is the pattern of where this debris is coming from that the 
US military wants to avoid. To date, it has been haphazard enough that no pattern has been 
established. Fireballs scream across both hemispheres, erratically. They have not formed a clear 
pattern of a lick from a large tail, and this coming from the direction of the Sun. The cover-up has 
reached the stage where excuses can no longer be given, so no excuses are given. This in and of 
itself is evidence of the cover-up crumbling and failing. 
 
Brooklyn Building Collapse  
Buildings are continuing to fall down, for no apparent reason. The latest in Brooklyn, where the only 
indication of a pending collapse was a long crack down the façade of the building. The crack had been 
there for 10 years. Shaking, was another recent problem, ongoing for 6 months. But no one expected the 
building to just collapse in a heap.  
- 4-Story Fort Greene Building Collapses
 
June 21, 2009 
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06212009/news/regionalnews/  
- A four-story Brooklyn building recently cited for a long crack in its facade dramatically 
collapsed this afternoon, stunning onlookers and spurring the evacuation of five nearby 
buildings. The building's owner, William Sang, showed up at the scene right before the 
collapse after a tenant called to report falling items in his apartments. The building's upper 
three floors contained apartments housing five tenants in all, while the ground floor had 
been occupied by a popular watering hole, Vesper Bar and Lounge. Sang was quick to 
blame the owner of the adjacent building, pointing out that right before the collapse 
yesterday there had workers doing repairs on the other building's façade. .However, the 
Building Department inspectors had written up Sang's building on May 1 for shaking and a 
crack measuring one-half inch to one-inch that ran from the first to third floor. The crack's 
been there for 10 years. The building has been shaking for past six months. 
 
 
  
 
What occurred here? What was causing the periodic shaking in an otherwise sound building? I live in a 
105 year old home that has cracked plaster in the walls due to settling, and when the freight train roars by 
the house jiggles due, I suspect, to water in the soil just 15 feet below ground level. I'm sure I'm not alone 
here in town. But I'm not expecting my house to suddenly collapse, nor have any in the village collapsed, 
ever.  
 
ZetaTalk Analysis 6/23/2009: All buildings settle, and most develop cracks in the paster or the 
brick or mortar façade showing that settling has occurred. Homes or buildings where the 
foundation is on ground that can transmit vibrations due to water in the soil will jiggle or shake if 
a quake or heavy rail or road traffic initiates those vibrations. The ability of a home or building to 
jiggle or shake, rather than resist vibrations, is actually a sign the building will withstand an 
earthquake, as the tree that bends stands in a windstorm while the tree that is rigid will crack. 
This Brooklyn building, by the crack, showed that the ground under the building was unstable, as 
it had settled in the past. It was not on solid rock. We predicted years ago that incidences of 
imploding buildings would begin to occur, where the substructure would simply give way so the 
building had no support. This is one such incidence. The substrata dropped under the building, 
destabilizing it to the point where the building fell in upon itself, and suddenly. That the basement 
floor and walls had dropped may or may not be reported in the media. The truth may be killed by 
the cover-up over the various Earth changes caused by the presence of Planet X. The ground is 
moving, heaving and dropping, increasingly.  
 
DC Metro Crash  
A horrific accident on the DC metro occurred on June 22, when one train piled on top of another. Per a 
fail-safe system installed on the metro years ago, this should not have occurred. A computer system 
should have taken over the approaching train and applied its brakes.  
- 9 Dead After Metro Accident
 
June 23, 2009 
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1702179 
- An inbound Metro train smashed into the back of another at the height of the Monday 
evening rush hour, killing at least nine people and injuring scores of others in Metro's 
deadliest ever subway accident. Experts familiar with Metro's operating systems tell The 
Washington Post operator error and failure of the signal system likely caused the deadly 
crash. To prevent trains from colliding, Metro designed a fail-safe computerized system that 
controls speed and breaking. If trains get too close to each other, the computers are 
supposed to automatically apply the brakes. Officials had no explanation for the cause of 
the accident that happened as the six-car trains were headed toward the Fort Totten 
station. The trains' devices that record operating speeds and commands are being turned 
over to the National Transportation Safety Board. The FBI is on the scene Tuesday 
morning. Metro officials say the FBI is assisting the NTSB with evidence collection.
 
 
  
 
There are many points where the system could have failed, but the computer logs and testing of the 
various devices should be able to show the point of failure, if any. Per the Zetas, the answer to this failure, 
like the crash of Air France 447, will never be known.  
 
ZetaTalk Analysis 6/23/2009: This is an accident that could have resulted from multiple failure 
points. The computer system could have faulted, failing to initiate braking. The devices on the 
train sensing the speed of the train could have failed. The devices on the track ahead could have 
failed to alert the system to the presence of a parked train. Or the braking devices on the train 
could have failed. We predict that all devices will be removed to a safe lab, tested, and found 
intact and working correctly. Systems such as this have fail safe mechanisms, and this means 
redundant sensing controls so that if one fails, another clicks in. It is not merely a backup, it is a 
great deal of redundancy, so that all sensing devices must have failed, simultaneously. 
 
Could the computer have failed, simply being unaware of the speed of the train and the presence 
of another train on the track ahead? This evidence will be in the computer system log. We predict 
that the computer system readouts will show that all components of the system were sensing 
correctly, and the system correctly alerted the computer system. This was the case at the time the 
train announced it was stopping due to another on the tracks ahead. What then caused the train to 
return to moving ahead, as though the tracks were clear? It was as though the computer system 
were suddenly disconnected from communications from the track ahead, yet nothing had changed. 
The track ahead and the position of the stopped train ahead had not changed in any manner. Yet 
the computer system concluded an all clear.  
 
Clearly the brakes worked, and were responsive to the computer system. The train had slowed and 
announced it was stopping. The emergency manual brakes likewise worked, and were applied just 
ahead of the crash. So if all systems were operational, then what caused the failure? If the 
computer system concluded that the way ahead was clear, then the signal transmitted to the 
oncoming train from the tracks ahead was lost. We have mentioned the increasing problem of 
electro-magnetic pulse caused by the charged tail of Planet X. Where brownouts and blackouts 
occur, this is covered in the media by various excuses such as an overtaxed electrical system. But 
these pulses affect systems other than the grid, as the downing of Air France 447 shows. 
Increasing incidences such as this will be occurring.  
 
Evidence does indeed show that the computer system was functional, as the train had stopped due to a 
train ahead, making this announcement, but then mysteriously restarted again. Clearly the braking system 
on the ongoing train was functional, or the train would not have slowed and stopped when making the 
announcement. Evidence shows by this that the signal from the tracks ahead, signaling that a stopped train 
was on the tracks ahead, was functional too. For some reason, the computer system thought the track 
ahead had been cleared. That reason had to be an electromagnetic pulse that interfered with transmission 
of the signal from the track ahead.  
- Investigators Seek Why Automated Train Didn't Stop
 
June 23, 2009 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090624/ap_on_re_us/us_dc_metro_train_derailment 
- Safety officials also are investigating a passenger's statement that the train had stopped 
briefly then started again before the accident. When the train is in automatic mode, the 
operator's main job is to open and close the doors and respond to emergencies. 
 
-  
 
- Chronology of Capitol's Deadliest Public Transit Disaster
 
June 23, 2009 
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/specials/interactives/wdc/  
- According to one passenger an announcement was made before the crash that the train was 
stopping because there was another train ahead. Soon after, the train started moving. 
Within second, it strikes the train stopped ahead. 
 
-  
 
- Computer Failure Could Be Cause of DC Metro Crash Killing 9
 
June 24, 2009, 
http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=104972 
- The emergency brake button was depressed, and the steel rails showed evidence that the 
brakes were engaged.
 
-  
 
- Cause of Washington DC Metro Crash Under Investigation
 
June 22, 2009 
http://www.petergreenberg.com/2009/06/23/cause-of-washington-dc-metro-crash-under-investigation/ 
- The investigation is complicated by the fact that the rear train was not equipped with data 
recorders, which will make it more difficult to piece together what happened.
 
 
 
 
You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly 
Unsubscribe.  
 |